LjUjPmNoQaBhJyLaRoZcBrCzVkVwIiMuRkHmHiEuHoLiBpFcYfCuIaQcEkWcKiAdGhJiKyYoHtBxEcLaDzPrLpDqLlYyWrGsBsFxJzZyCdLoOxSuKtSnEwJqClOmDpGvIzAzNiNzUoAwMsIvFbLcXxFkXgTpMlSjIiGoRqAfCxMdXzSkGcGvJyDtInPdBoFyGqVeLw

Guinness World Record for Exorbitant Crown Cocktail is Shaken, Not Stirred, as Back Story Emerges

Guinnes<span id="more-6642"></span>s World Record for Exorbitant Crown Cocktail is Shaken, Not Stirred, as Back Story Emerges

‘The Winston’ cocktail, made with 1858 classic cognac by a celebrity mixologist at the Crown Melbourne, was section of a bungled publicity stunt that cost the casino over a drink.

The Crown Casino in Melbourne could be stripped of the Guinness World Record as a result of strange story of a cheating Kiwi millionaire, a $32 million casino scam, a narrowly averted PR tragedy, and the planet’s most expensive cocktail that is free.

The saga begins in September 2013, at the Crown Casino’s Club 23, a club co-owned by Crown owner James Packer, famous cricketer that is retired Warne, and previous WSOP Main Event champ Joe Hachem.

Australian news and officials from the Guinness Book of reports had collected to witness high-roller businessman Giang Nguyen imbibe the globe’s most high priced cocktail.

‘The Churchill,’ was made with 1858-vintage Croizet Cuvee Leonie cognac, a measure of Chartreuse VEP Vert (a French herbal-infused liqueur produced by monks) and splash of Angostura Bitters, among other ridiculously expensive and notably odd components. The drink is really so named as they planned the D-Day landings during WWII because it was purportedly the beverage of choice for PM Winston Churchill and President Dwight Eisenhower.

Not A cheap Date

The high cost was AU$12,500, approximately US$9,500, hence all the hullabaloo while the guy from Guinness with all the clipboard watch that is keeping.

But oddly, as current media made note, Nguyen looked uncomfortable, took one sip, declared that it is ‘good’ and hurried down in to the evening, leaving about $8000-worth of vintage booze unsipped. The question is why.

Rewind to February of 2013. Crown announced via pr release that New Zealand millionaire James Manning is the man to cough up five figures for the impossibly luxe new cocktail. Manning was indeed lured to Crown by a member of the VIP services staff, the department that is faced with attracting and retaining whales that are high-rolling.

The plan was that Manning would come to Crown, gamble big and lose big, before obliging the casino by firmly taking component in their little publicity stunt. Exactly What could possibly fail?

What Crown didn’t know was that Manning was a cheat that is skilled card counter, and had employed some body on the inside to signal information to him. Utilizing a technique that the casino hasn’t fully elaborated upon, Manning took Crown for $32 million in just eight hands of blackjack.

‘We could not believe what he had won and a number of the bets he placed were very, very dubious,’ a previous crown executive told the Sydney Morning Herald. ‘Those eight hands, in particular … he bet up against the chances and won, so one of our surveillance guys chose to have a closer look.’

PR Catastrophe

A closer look revealed that Manning and their accomplice, the guy from the VIP department who had invited him in the place that is first no less, were in cahoots, operating a complex scam to cheat the casino.

Manning was immediately turned out of his room in the middle of the evening and barred for eternity from the property. As the majority that is vast of money had not yet been paid, Crown decided not to press charges, but it left the PR department in a bit of a pickle.

‘Having James Manning done for the gambling heist just before the big event was not into the script,’ said a previous person in crown’s PR team. ‘We had the cognac, we’d the function arranged, we just didn’t have a customer. We had been in an awful bind.’

The the fact is, then, that Nguyen had been a shill, a friend of the management, bussed in at the final minute. The publicity stunt had been all for show therefore the Crown would reimburse him the complete sum the next morning.

Essentially, Nguyen got a drink of the world’s most expensive cocktail for free from Crown, in which he wasn’t also a top model or Mariah Carey.

Macau Revenues Down Again, But Some See Signs Of Hope

Macau’s gaming industry continues to struggle, though analysts see some indications of the recovery. (Image: Ed Jones/AFP/Getty Pictures)

Macau’s gaming profits are continuing their seemingly endless tumble, falling once again in June to produce it 13 straight months of decrease for the Chinese enclave.

However, not all for the news being released of Macau was bad for the casinos, suggesting that although the current trends are painful, there could be hope on the horizon that things could improve in the future that is not-too-distant.

First, however, there’s the news that is bad.

Macau’s Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau reported that casinos within the territory took in under $2.2 billion in gaming revenue in June, down 36 percent compared to the period that is same year earlier.

That’s the lowest figure for Macau since November 2010.

Overall, annual gaming revenues are down about 37 percent in 2015 set alongside the first half a year of final year.

Incremental Improvement Provides Some Hope

Nevertheless, the June figures were slightly better than the projections of some analysts.

‘Although a 36 per cent year-over-year decline is not even close to healthier, we find it encouraging the theme of modest comparison that is sequential remains on trend,’ said video gaming analyst Steven Wieczynski of Stifel Nicolaus Capital Markets.

In other words, the fact that things have been slightly less terrible for Macau recently is a step into the right way. There are also indications that profits could start to tick backup this summer, too.

Gaming revenues were actually up over the very last nine days of this which could be related to the start of the summer tourism season month.

If those increases continue into July, the yearly figures could start to look definitely better for Macau, especially since the final couple of months of 2014 were specially brutal for the casinos there.

Relaxed Visitation Rules Could Encourage More Tourism

In addition, the Chinese government finally appears to be stepping in to help Macau a little. As of Wednesday, visitation rules have actually been calm, and mainland Chinese residents can now see Macau twice per month rather than twice per every 60 day period. The length that is maximum of one stay in addition has increased from five days to seven.

That choice caused casino that is many to surge this week. Four of five casino stocks placed in Hong Kong saw their biggest gains in the previous four years, including MGM Asia, Wynn Macau, and Sands Asia.

Even in the event the actual impact of this choice is relatively little, it might probably signal a change in policy from the mainland government that is chinese which hurt Macau’s gaming industry significantly with its anti-corruption policies that cut much associated with cash flow to your territory.

Analysts anticipate more supportive measures from China later on in 2015, and regardless if none of these changes are dramatic, they could have a good effect that is cumulative.

Not every one of the news coming out of Macau is good. The Macau government is introducing a smoking that is full in its legislature this week. That bill is apt to be passed later on this year, and could be implemented when very early year that is next.

On the basis of the impact that a ban on smoking in mass market casino areas had, analysts believe that this ban that is new which may expand to more private gaming areas, could similarly damage spending by high rollers, with some predicting a 10 to 15 percent reduction in play indian dreaming slot profits because associated with cigarette smoking prohibition.

Tennis Match Fixing Issues Continue Steadily To Make Headlines

Few would accuse anyone of match fixing at Wimbledon, but many state that the practice is widespread among lower-ranked players at smaller occasions. (Image: Wikipedia)

Tennis happens to be faced with accusations of match fixing for years: from the infamous match between Nikolay Davydenko and Martin Vassallo Arguello in 2007 that first introduced much of the general public to questions about the integrity of matches in some smaller tournaments to suspensions levied against two players early in the day this year, there always seems to be something lurking beneath the sport’s area.

Those concerns were aired again this week in a story by The Daily Beast, which once again attempted to delve through the information available to you about tennis and figure out just how much of a issue match fixing is for the sport.

One 2014 study cited in that story estimated that one percent of all of the tournament that is first-round may be fixed, which may mean significantly more than 20 matches a year were influenced by gamblers; other estimates and guesses have recommended that multiple matches each week could possibly be fixed, though that’s nevertheless a very small portion of all of the professional tennis matches.

Low Pay Leads to Temptation for Lower-Ranked Players

What makes tennis therefore vulnerable to match repairing?

There are a mixture of factors, a lot of that really help explain why the problem seems most prominent at the low quantities of the ranks that are professional.

First, there’s the obvious fact that tennis ( at the very least in singles play) is a specific sport.

There is only anyone that needs to be bribed in order to have them to throw a match (equivalent issue that leads numerous to fear widespread integrity problems in boxing and other combat recreations), and there are no teammates or substitutes to choose the slack up for a player who is struggling.

That said, no one is accusing Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal of fixing matches at Wimbledon.

For one, there is the fact that these matches have an intense level of scrutiny on them; possibly even more importantly, though, star tennis players are extremely well compensated, meaning it might cost anyone attempting to repair a match at that degree an excessive quantity of cash, if it may be done at all.

That is perhaps not to say that nobody tries. Even Novak Djokovic has told a tale to be offered $100,000 to repair a match back in 2006.

But players on the Challenger Tour or other low-ranked competitors aren’t making nearly that much money, and may also lose cash in a given tournament after travel and coaching expenses are taken into account.

That means they are targets that are prime gamblers trying to fix a match.

Spot Betting Allows Fixing Without Impacting Match Result

Another issue is the fact gamblers don’t have to fix a match that is entire find ways to profit.

Because numerous gambling sites and bookmakers provide betting on sets or games that are even individual players can reach agreements allowing certain events to take place at the best times to fulfill gamblers while nevertheless playing to win overall.

‘One particular fix that is common be to separate the first two sets to a predetermined script, then play the third set fairly to determine which player progresses,’ sports modeler Ian Dorward told Slate earlier this 12 months.

The Tennis Integrity Unit is the human body tasked with rooting out such issues, and they have sometimes made examples of players. In March, Elie Rousset and Walkter Trusendi each received six-month suspensions and fines for violations of anti-corruption guidelines, though perhaps not for match-fixing.

But no matter what the Integrity Unit does, it is not likely to alter the culture that permits lower-ranked players to be incentivized to aid gamblers who want to make sure bets.

That would need a change that is complete exactly how compensation works up and down the different levels of expert tennis, something which probably won’t happen any time quickly.