Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence occurred in a town club in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some naive slots machines after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip websites that are streaming where watchers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing down vapor, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but perhaps not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. Whenever working with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here most of the time to relax and play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of money. He could be a laborer and only works any now and then.’ Apparently, this really is one worker who keeps their own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a tremendously quiet man. He just moved in really calmly with an axe and smashed all the devices. There had been a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of the two stories is just a bit more frightening, since the axe was wielded maybe not at the slots, but at a member of the staff at a gambling store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting store in Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with some cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he didn’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity stated that two men, both putting on ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm in the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant with the tree-chopping tool.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of money,’ and the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way of a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up on the scene.
Whose Casino Can It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each and every of the three licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has had its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight throughout the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposal that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate option is pertaining to the theory that neighboring communities is affected by casino projects, but won’t have to be able to vote on whether those casinos ought to be opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, has been one of the handful of candidates who have recommended that most of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that could be based in East Boston, for instance.
When it comes down to the proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote on it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it could have on many Boston communities.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in only one community,’ Conley said within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed benefits.’
Based on the state laws that produced the chance of three new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino designers are required to negotiate settlement, with arbitration required in the event that gambling enterprises and local governments can’t visited a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed taking a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law in terms of the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while nevertheless granting East Boston veto power throughout the vote that is entire. In other terms, the casino could have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the whole city so as to be authorized.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents discovered that 44% were in favor of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters return these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii while the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken fully to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing star of great britain’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the sports book cookie jar after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired premier activities company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a betting store critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna however accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business assistant, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.
Since Gala Coral Group is one regarding the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the country- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the neighborhood roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘we understand there was huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with gambling shops and cash advance organizations that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a written report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says a very important factor in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for the politician.
Spared on a Technicality
Nonetheless, fighting back in the corner of this Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna stated that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a personal capacity, and was accepted in respect using the rules and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working office of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for company, as more chilli slot youtube well as for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
And while Goulden is not a relative head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or not the Conservative Party that are searching to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this kind of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in his neighborhood constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he certainly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is considered to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this season their office was accused of modifying his Wikipedia page to show evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.